When is a giant?

Polls on just about Anything Macro. Updated occasionally. :)

At what height where it becomes Macro?

9 ft (2.7m)
42
12%
12 ft (3.65 m)
117
33%
20 ft (6 m)
192
55%
 
Total votes : 351

Postby Wrangler » Sun Nov 21, 2004 4:23 am

Anything over 9 feet is inhuman, so I say the first option.
Image
Wrangler
Gojira
Gojira
 
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 3:01 am

Postby Lone » Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:49 am

Usually most macro's drawn or written about are over the one hundred mark so i usually picture them as that, but i guess that being two times as tall as someone would count you as a macro.
Lone
Extinction Level Event
Extinction Level Event
 
Posts: 701
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 11:46 pm

Postby Louisisthebest_007 » Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:54 pm

You've got to remember that normal humans tend to exsadgeurate things slightly bigger then them to be Giants. An ordinary 5'8 person next to a 6'2 would make the 6'2 person a giant to those who want to make it sound interesting.

In my opinon, Any person who tall enough that other people are about the center of their chest is Macro...In the polls that would make it 9ft...But if the person happened to be quite slender...then people would find him just as giant being 12ft which is double size!
All the other people in this discussion tend to think higher then 20ft because they're still thinking of 'Standard' Macro sizes and not the minimum sizes.

I think that if we were being realistic, 9ft would be the min. Macro height...if we were going to Macro-realistic stories where theres someone who big but not super massive...then 12ft would be a better bet.

I'll vote 9ft just for realism ;)
User avatar
Louisisthebest_007
Extinction Level Event
Extinction Level Event
 
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:56 pm

Postby 13years » Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:52 am

Macro is 20 feet for me, after seeing these choices, 9 is a freak with a broken petuitary gland, and 12 is a speck (now being compared to the macro world).
Furbase Page (13years & link to Taylor):
http://furbase.bigfurs.com/index.php?FurID=1018
FA Page (Frequented):
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/13years/

Drop me a PM anytime or send an email to 13yearsmdc@gmail.com.
User avatar
13years
Extinction Level Event
Extinction Level Event
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 5:17 am
Location: Sanity... psyche!

Postby H@m » Thu Jan 26, 2006 3:23 pm

To tell you the truth you dont have to be any larger than 4 feet to be a giant(youd know this if youve seen the episode of the goodies beanstalk or somthing)anyway its bloodline that makes you a giant not your height, such as dwarfs & midgets there small humans and we dont call them a diffrent race, do we?
H@m
 

Postby maxx mann » Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:23 am

Well I agree with many here that 20' is a nice start. But this would be a minimum because I have to figure in the crush and rampage ratio!
User avatar
maxx mann
Extinction Level Event
Extinction Level Event
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:33 am
Location: Look up!

Postby amanaskunkcat » Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:55 am

I didn't really vote on this one, because I don't think any of the answers in the polls really make for a true macro. As I feel this poll means to ask.

Around 50ft I think is the lower limit.

Anything below that is fun in its own way. (And I make alot of use of chars in size ranges like 10', 12' and the like on Taps) And sure.. you could call it giant. (But you can call someone who is 6'7 or so a 'giant' too!) But its not really MACRO per se.
~I'm nice enough... I'm just honest as well.~

My Webpage ---> http://www.theskunkcat.furtopia.org/index.htm

My Fur Affinity page ---> http://furaffinity.net/user/theskunkcat/
User avatar
amanaskunkcat
Extinction Level Event
Extinction Level Event
 
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Sol III

Postby ShadowedDay » Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:25 am

It's been stated before, but simply, Anywhere between 4 and 8 feet is normal, between 8 and 20 feet is really just big, and above that is the absolutely grand range of size we call Macro.
ShadowedDay
Newbie / Lurker
Newbie / Lurker
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 12:20 am
Location: North Carolina, USA

Postby Naif » Mon Mar 13, 2006 12:41 am

I found this question very interesting.

In my opinion, it's Macro when the size difference is 4 times, which means the smaller person's head is at the height of the bigger one's knees. The reason is, this difference is unusual large and rarely seen between humans, and the power of the bigger over the small is nearly total.
Naif
Newbie / Lurker
Newbie / Lurker
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:52 pm

Postby Gizmo » Tue Aug 08, 2006 2:16 am

i pick 12 because thats at least twice the height of most normal people
Image
User avatar
Gizmo
Rampage
Rampage
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:51 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Polls

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Usage of this site is goverend by the AUP
phpBB skin developed by: Abdul Turan & MPFans
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
© 1997-2012, Crescendo Communications